I have tested a variety of air purifiers over the past years, trying devices from dozens of brands. However, just a few months ago, I had the opportunity to test air purifiers from Shark and Aroeve, making this article a great opportunity to compare them.
Thus, I will compare the Shark HP102 and the Aroeve MK01, two small air purifiers with great features and similar design principles. They are also very popular among users.
The Shark HP102 is suitable for rooms of about 124 sq. ft., while the Aroeve MK01 is mentioned for smaller rooms of about 47 sq. ft. Both air purifiers clean the air 4.8 times per hour in their recommended room sizes.
Each purifier uses three-stage filtration technology, including a pre-filter, a HEPA filter (True HEPA in the case of the Shark), and a carbon filter. The filters in both are cylindrical, hollow in the middle, and placed inside the bottom part of the device.
I performed an in-depth analysis of both, tested their performance, noise levels, and power usage, and in this comparison, will decide on which one is a better buying option.
Specs: Shark HP102 Vs Aroeve MK01
| Product Image |  |  |
| Manufacturer | Shark | Aroeve |
| Model | HP102 | MK01 |
| Dimensions (inches / cm) | 8.7 x 8.7 x 14.6 inches (22 x 22 x 37 cm) | 6.1 x 6.1 x 9.7 inches (15.5 x 15.5 x 24.6 cm) |
| Weight (pounds / kg) | 5.85 lb (2.65 kg) | 3 lbs (1.4 kg) |
| Clean Air Delivery Rate (CADR) | 80 CFM (136 m³/h) | 30 CFM (51 m³/h) |
| Coverage (4.8 ACH)
Room Coverage Explanation: ACH is a measurement used in indoor air quality management to indicate how many times the air within a defined space is changed/moved through the filter media.
For more details, visit our ACH calculator tool. | 124 sq. ft. (11.5 m²) | 47 sq. ft. (4.4 m²) |
| Performance Ratings Performance Ratings Score Summary: 8.5 - Average Score (67 products) 9.8 - Best Score (2 products) 2.5 - Worst Score (2 products) We use the Temtop LKC-1000S laser particle meter to test the particle removal efficiency of every air purifier. It measures PM2.5 (µg/m3), PM10 (µg/m3), Particles (per/L), and HCHO (mg/m3) in the air, and also calculates the AQI. You can read more about our testing methodology here. | ||
| Filtration Technology | Pre-filter, Activated Carbon Filter, and True HEPA Filter | Pre-filter, HEPA Filter, and Carbon Filter |
| Filter Replacement Indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Filter Life | 6-12 months | 3-6 months |
| Power Consumption
Power Usage Summary: Our extensive testing of 67 air purifiers revealed the following power consumption insights:
Check out our power consumption calculator tool. | 24W | 17W |
| Operating Costs Ratings Operating Costs Ratings Score Summary: 9.1 - Average Score (67 products) 10 - Best Score (2 products) 8 - Worst Score (1 products) We measure the power usage at all speeds using an energy meter, after which we calculate how much it would cost to use the device at a particular fan speed for one month. For reference, we use an energy price of $0.12 per kWh. You can read more about our testing methodology here. | ||
| Number of Fan Speeds | 4 – Speed 1, Speed 2, Speed 3, and Speed 4 | 3 – Sleep Mode, Speed 1, and Speed 2 |
| Air Quality Sensor Air Quality Sensor Summary: Out of 67 air purifiers tested, only 31 have the air quality sensor. | Yes | No |
| Air Quality Indicator | Yes | No |
| Auto Mode Auto Mode Summary: Out of 67 air purifiers tested, only 32 have auto mode functionality. | Yes | No |
| Smart App Smart App Summary: Out of 67 air purifiers tested, only 20 have smart app functionality. | No | No |
| Voice Control Voice Control Summary: Out of 67 air purifiers tested, only 20 have voice control functionality. | No | No |
| Other Features | ECO ModeDisplay BrightnessDisplay LockTimer | Aroma Pad |
| Noise Level (low – high) | 41.7 – 56.5 dBA | 40.9 – 57.9 dBA |
| Noise Ratings Noise Ratings Score Summary: 9.3 - Average Score (67 products) 10 - Best Score (1 products) 8.2 - Worst Score (1 products) We use a special noise measurement tool to test the noise level of the air purifier at all speeds. We measured the noise level on the dBA scale. You can read more about our testing methodology here. | ||
| Best Suited For | Bedrooms Small Spaces Dust Children's Rooms Portable Use | Portable Use |
| Warranty | 2-year | 2-year |
| In-Depth Review | Shark HP102 | Aroeve MK01 |
| Price | Check Price on Amazon | Check Price on Amazon |
Final Conclusion: Which one is Better?
Clearly, the Shark HP102 is a more powerful device. It has a larger filter, a True HEPA filter, and an air quality sensor feature. These advantages are more than enough to declare it the better buying option in this comparison.
On the other hand, the Aroeve MK01 is very affordable and one of the best-selling air purifiers on the market. However, this isn’t enough to beat an air purifier like the Shark HP102.
If you have any questions about these Aroeve and Shark air purifiers, please leave a comment in the comments section below.
Leave a Reply